In order to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
using microform in the library, the following articles have been presented to
explore different perspectives on retaining microforms as backups, retaining
the original media after it has been microformed, what type of media is best
for backfiles, and, in Brown et al., the benefits, limitations, and areas of
further research into microfilm’s potential in the research and information
communities.
Silverman, R. (2015). Retaining hardcopy papers still
important in digital age. Newspaper
Research Journal, 36(3), 363-372. DOI: 10.1177/0739532915600749
Silverman makes the case for retaining hardcopy newspapers
even after they been microfilmed. He discusses the U.S. Newspaper Program and
its destruction of newspapers at a point where the preservation of newspapers
was a viable option. Silverman argues that only original newspapers have the
capacity to serve as backups for screen copies, serve as master copies for
augmenting, enhancing, or correcting faulty copies, and provide authentication
for original production and questions regarding provenance.
Canepi, K. (2003). Microfilm serial backfiles: Are they
still cost effective? Serials Review, 29(4),
282-286.
Canepi compares the cost of bound serials, microfilm
backfiles, and digital backfiles. Her study suggests that bound journals are
now considered more cost effective than microfilm backfiles and stable
electronic backfiles can be more cost effective than bound journals. While
microfilm was once the most cost effective it no longer is.
Brown, H., et al. (2012). The role of microfilm in digital
preservation. Microform &
Digitization Review, 41(2), pp. 65-82. DOI: 10.1515/mir-2012-0008
Brown et al. identify microfilm’s key benefits as longevity,
sustainability, and flexibility that they can also be used to great success as data
integrity and digital risk management tools. Identified limitations include its
physicality and therefore incapable of capturing dynamic, interactive digital
materials. The writers also discuss microfilm’s ability to bridge the gap
between digital and analog materials. They also identify a number of further
research areas which need to be explored such as the life expectancy of color
film and the need to develop standards for “digital to microfilm” conversion
among others.
No comments:
Post a Comment